TOEFL Academic Reading Practice

18:00

The Circular Economy: A Sustainable Alternative to Linear Production

For centuries, the global economy has operated on a predominantly linear model, a system forged during the Industrial Revolution. This model follows a simple ‘take-make-dispose’ pathway: raw materials are extracted from the earth, manufactured into products, and sold to consumers who then discard them as waste when they are no longer needed or functional. This approach was built on the assumption that natural resources are abundant, easily accessible, and inexpensive to dispose of. However, the relentless pace of this system has led to resource depletion, massive waste generation, and severe environmental degradation. The linear economy, by its very design, is unsustainable in a world of finite resources and a growing population, pushing humanity to seek a more intelligent and restorative alternative.

The proposed alternative is the circular economy, a model that fundamentally rethinks the way we produce and consume goods. In contrast to the linear system’s endpoint of waste, the circular economy is intentionally restorative and regenerative by design. Its core principles are threefold: first, to design out waste and pollution from the outset; second, to keep products and materials in continuous use at their highest possible value; and third, to regenerate natural systems. Proponents argue that this model decouples economic growth from resource consumption, offering a pathway to long-term resilience and prosperity. It represents a shift from focusing on efficiency in a destructive system to redesigning the system itself to be effective and beneficial.

The first principle, designing out waste, is a proactive approach that tackles the problem at its source. In a circular model, products are designed for durability, repairability, and disassembly. For instance, a smartphone might be built with a modular design, allowing a user to easily replace a cracked screen or a failing battery instead of discarding the entire device. This design philosophy also emphasizes the use of non-toxic, biodegradable, or highly recyclable materials that can be safely returned to either the biosphere or the technical cycle. By considering a product’s entire lifecycle during the design phase, manufacturers can eliminate a significant portion of the waste that is currently sent to landfills and incinerators.

The second principle focuses on creating systems to keep products and materials circulating. This has spurred the growth of innovative business models that prioritize access over ownership. For example, instead of every individual owning a car that sits idle for most of the day, car-sharing services allow multiple users to access a single vehicle, maximizing its utility and reducing the total number of cars needed. Similarly, companies are increasingly offering products as a service, such as leasing office furniture or lighting systems. In this model, the manufacturer retains ownership and is responsible for maintenance, repair, and eventual take-back. This incentivizes them to produce highly durable and remanufacturable goods, as their profit is tied to the product's longevity and performance, not just its initial sale.

Finally, the principle of regenerating natural systems marks a crucial departure from simply aiming to be "less bad." While the linear economy degrades natural capital, a circular economy seeks to actively improve it. In this framework, biological materials—such as food scraps or agricultural byproducts—are not treated as waste but as valuable nutrients to be returned to the soil. Practices like industrial-scale composting or anaerobic digestion can convert this organic "waste" into fertilizers or biogas, enriching farmland and reducing the need for synthetic inputs. This approach mimics natural ecosystems, where the waste from one organism becomes the food for another, creating a closed-loop system that enhances environmental health.

The transition to a circular economy is not without significant challenges. It requires substantial investment in new technologies, widespread policy changes to create a level playing field, and a fundamental shift in consumer mindset away from disposability. However, the potential benefits are immense. By creating new industries in repair, remanufacturing, and recycling, and by reducing reliance on volatile raw material markets, the circular economy offers a compelling vision for a future that is both environmentally sustainable and economically prosperous. It is an invitation to innovate and build a system that works better for businesses, people, and the planet.

Questions

1. Why does the author mention the Industrial Revolution in paragraph 1?

Hint: Consider why an author would begin a discussion of a modern problem by referencing a historical event. The first sentence directly links the two.

Explanation: The passage states that the linear model was "forged during the Industrial Revolution." The author mentions this to establish the historical foundation and context for the system he is about to critique, making B the correct answer. The author is not praising it (D), arguing for a return to older methods (C), or just discussing innovation (A).

2. What can be inferred from paragraph 1 about the assumptions underlying the linear economy?

Hint: The paragraph states the linear model was "built on the assumption that natural resources are abundant" but then notes that this system is "unsustainable in a world of finite resources." Connect these two points.

Explanation: The passage contrasts the past assumptions (abundant resources) with the present reality (finite resources, environmental degradation). This implies that those initial assumptions are no longer valid or correct in today's world. This supports C. The other options are contradicted by the text.

3. Why does the author discuss a smartphone with a modular design in paragraph 3?

Hint: Look at the sentence immediately before the smartphone example. The example serves to clarify the general principle stated there.

Explanation: Paragraph 3 introduces the principle of "designing out waste" by creating products for "durability, repairability, and disassembly." The modular smartphone is then presented "for instance," making it a specific illustration of this abstract concept. This matches option C perfectly.

4. What can be inferred about business models like car-sharing and product leasing described in paragraph 4?

Hint: The paragraph states that when a manufacturer retains ownership and is responsible for maintenance, their profit is tied to the product's "longevity and performance." What does this imply about their financial motivation?

Explanation: If a company's profit depends on a product lasting a long time (longevity), it has a strong financial reason to make that product durable and easy to repair. This directly supports the inference in C. The passage doesn't provide enough information to judge profitability (A) or exclusivity to certain sectors (B), and it presents these models as innovative, not old (D).

5. What is the author's primary purpose in discussing practices like composting and anaerobic digestion in paragraph 5?

Hint: The paragraph introduces the main idea of "regenerating natural systems" by returning biological materials to the soil. How do the examples of composting and anaerobic digestion relate to this main idea?

Explanation: The author uses these two practices as specific examples of how "valuable nutrients" can be returned to the soil, thus illustrating the broader principle of regenerating natural systems. Option A accurately describes this function. The author isn't primarily criticizing farming (B), explaining chemistry in detail (C), or making a sweeping argument about all waste (D).

6. What can be inferred from the discussion of "regenerating natural systems" in paragraph 5?

Hint: The paragraph states this principle is a "crucial departure from simply aiming to be 'less bad'" and that it "seeks to actively improve" natural capital. What does this imply about its goals?

Explanation: By contrasting the circular goal with being merely "less bad" and emphasizing active improvement ("regenerating"), the passage implies the goal is to have a net positive, or restorative, impact. This makes C the best inference. Option A is what the passage is contrasting with. Options B and D are not supported by the text.

7. Why does the author mention that a manufacturer "retains ownership" in a product-as-a-service model in paragraph 4?

Hint: Analyze the cause-and-effect relationship in the sentence. Why does retaining ownership lead to a certain kind of behavior from the manufacturer?

Explanation: The author explicitly connects the manufacturer's retained ownership to a specific outcome: "This incentivizes them to produce highly durable and remanufacturable goods..." The purpose of mentioning ownership is to explain this powerful incentive, as stated in option B.

8. What can be inferred from the final paragraph about the transition to a circular economy?

Hint: The paragraph lists several requirements for the transition: "investment in new technologies, widespread policy changes... and a fundamental shift in consumer mindset." What does needing all these different things imply?

Explanation: The list of requirements involves technology (businesses), policy (governments), and mindset (consumers). The need for changes in all these areas implies that a successful transition cannot be achieved by one group alone but requires a coordinated, society-wide effort. This supports C. The passage directly contradicts options A, B, and D.

9. In the final paragraph, why does the author mention that the circular economy can create "new industries"?

Hint: The author first acknowledges challenges and then immediately mentions benefits like new industries. What is the rhetorical effect of presenting a solution right after a problem?

Explanation: After mentioning "significant challenges," the author introduces positive economic outcomes like "new industries" to counterbalance the difficulties. This serves to reinforce the idea that despite the hurdles, the circular economy is a worthwhile and economically viable pursuit. This makes B the best answer. The purpose isn't primarily to warn (A) or to suggest it's too expensive (D).

10. What can be inferred about products designed under the traditional linear model?

Hint: The passage states that in a circular economy, products are designed for "durability, repairability, and disassembly." If this is the new model, what can you infer about the old (linear) model?

Explanation: By presenting repairability and disassembly as key features of the new circular model, the passage implies that these features are absent from the old linear model. Therefore, one can reasonably infer that products made under the linear model are often designed in a way that makes them difficult to repair or take apart. This supports option B. The other options are the opposite of what is implied about linear-model products.

Glossary of Challenging Vocabulary

Term English Definition & Example Myanmar Definition & Example (မြန်မာဘာသာ)
Linear Progressing from one stage to another in a single series of steps; sequential.
Ex: The traditional factory operates on a linear production model.
တစ်ခုပြီးတစ်ခု အဆင့်လိုက် ဖြစ်ပေါ်တိုးတက်သော၊ အစဉ်လိုက်။
ဥပမာ: ရှေးရိုးစက်ရုံသည် အဆင့်လိုက် ထုတ်လုပ်မှုပုံစံ (linear model) ဖြင့် လည်ပတ်သည်။
Finite Having limits or bounds.
Ex: We must manage our planet's finite resources carefully.
အကန့်အသတ်ရှိသော၊ ကုန်ဆုံးနိုင်သော။
ဥပမာ: ကျွန်ုပ်တို့သည် ကမ္ဘာဂြိုဟ်၏ အကန့်အသတ်ရှိသော သယံဇာတများကို ဂရုတစိုက် စီမံခန့်ခွဲရမည်။
Regenerate To regrow or cause to regrow; to bring into existence again.
Ex: The circular economy aims to regenerate natural systems rather than deplete them.
ပြန်လည်ဖြစ်ပေါ်စေသည်၊ အသစ်တဖန် ဖြစ်တည်စေသည်။
ဥပမာ: စက်ဝိုင်းပုံစီးပွားရေးစနစ်သည် သဘာဝစနစ်များကို ကုန်ခန်းစေမည့်အစား ပြန်လည်ရှင်သန်စေရန် ရည်ရွယ်သည်။
Modularity The degree to which a system's components may be separated and recombined.
Ex: The phone's modularity allows users to replace the camera themselves.
စနစ်တစ်ခု၏ အစိတ်အပိုင်းများကို ခွဲထုတ်၍ ပြန်လည်ပေါင်းစပ်နိုင်သည့် အတိုင်းအတာ။
ဥပမာ: ထိုဖုန်း၏ အစိတ်အပိုင်းများ ခွဲထုတ်နိုင်မှု (modularity) ကြောင့် သုံးစွဲသူများသည် ကင်မရာကို ကိုယ်တိုင် လဲလှယ်နိုင်သည်။
Durability The ability to withstand wear, pressure, or damage; hard-wearing.
Ex: The company is known for the durability of its products.
ပွန်းပဲ့ပျက်စီးမှုကို ခံနိုင်ရည်ရှိခြင်း၊ အကြမ်းခံခြင်း။
ဥပမာ: ထိုကုမ္ပဏီသည် ၎င်း၏ ထုတ်ကုန်များ၏ ခိုင်ခံ့မှု (durability) ကြောင့် လူသိများသည်။
Remanufacturing The process of rebuilding a product to specifications of the original manufactured product using a combination of reused, repaired and new parts.
Ex: Engine remanufacturing is a key part of the automotive circular economy.
အသုံးပြုပြီးသား၊ ပြုပြင်ထားသော သို့မဟုတ် အသစ်ဖြစ်သော အစိတ်အပိုင်းများကို ပေါင်းစပ်၍ ထုတ်ကုန်တစ်ခုကို မူလစံနှုန်းများအတိုင်း ပြန်လည်တည်ဆောက်ခြင်း။
ဥပမာ: အင်ဂျင်ကို ပြန်လည်တည်ဆောက်ခြင်း (remanufacturing) သည် မော်တော်ယာဉ်ဆိုင်ရာ စက်ဝိုင်းပုံစီးပွားရေးစနစ်၏ အဓိက အစိတ်အပိုင်းတစ်ခု ဖြစ်သည်။
Resilience The capacity to recover quickly from difficulties; toughness.
Ex: Building economic resilience is a major goal of this new policy.
အခက်အခဲများမှ လျင်မြန်စွာ ပြန်လည်ထူထောင်နိုင်စွမ်း။
ဥပမာ: စီးပွားရေးဆိုင်ရာ ကြံ့ခိုင်မှု (resilience) ကို တည်ဆောက်ခြင်းသည် ဤမူဝါဒသစ်၏ အဓိကရည်မှန်းချက်ဖြစ်သည်။
Proponents People who publicly support a particular idea or plan of action.
Ex: Proponents of the circular economy believe it can solve many environmental problems.
သီးခြားအကြံဉာဏ် သို့မဟုတ် အစီအစဉ်တစ်ခုကို လူသိရှင်ကြား ထောက်ခံသူများ။
ဥပမာ: စက်ဝိုင်းပုံစီးပွားရေးစနစ်ကို ထောက်ခံသူများ (proponents) က ၎င်းသည် သဘာဝပတ်ဝန်းကျင်ဆိုင်ရာ ပြဿနာများစွာကို ဖြေရှင်းနိုင်သည်ဟု ယုံကြည်ကြသည်။
Cambridge Dictionary Lookup ×