TOEFL iBT Listening Practice
Listen to a lecture from an environmental science class and answer the questions that follow.
Lecture: Bio-indicators
Lecture Transcript
Professor: Good morning, everyone. Alright, settle down. So, last week we discussed large-scale ecosystems. Today, I want to narrow our focus and look at a fascinating tool we use in environmental science to monitor the health of those ecosystems. We're going to talk about bio-indicators.
So, what exactly is a bio-indicator? The name gives you a clue. "Bio" for life, and "indicator" for... well, something that indicates or points to a condition. Simply put, a bio-indicator is a living organism—a plant, an animal, a fungus—that gives us an idea about the health of its surrounding environment. Think of it as an early warning system. The classic historical example, though not a perfect scientific one, is the "canary in a coal mine." Miners used to take canaries down into the mines because the birds are extremely sensitive to toxic gases like carbon monoxide. If the canary became ill or died, the miners knew the air was unsafe and they needed to evacuate immediately. The canary was indicating danger.
Now, in ecology, we use this principle in a more sophisticated way. But what makes a species a good bio-indicator? There are a few key characteristics.
First, they need to be sensitive to changes in their environment, particularly to pollutants. But not too sensitive, or they'd just disappear at the slightest change. There's a sweet spot.
Second, they should be relatively widespread and common, so we have a good baseline to study and can find them easily across different locations.
And third, they are often sedentary, meaning they don't move around much. Why is that important? Well, if an animal roams over a huge territory, its health reflects a wide range of conditions. But a sedentary organism, like a mussel or a lichen, tells you the story of that specific spot.
Let's look at a couple of real-world examples. Perhaps the most famous bio-indicators for air quality are lichens. You’ve all seen them—those crusty, leafy growths on trees and rocks. Lichens are actually a composite organism, a symbiotic relationship between a fungus and an alga. They get most of their nutrients directly from the air, not the soil. This means they are incredibly effective at absorbing everything in the atmosphere, including pollutants like sulfur dioxide (SO2) from industrial emissions.
Different types of lichens have different tolerance levels. In an area with very clean air, you'll find a rich diversity, including the leafy, bushy types. As air quality declines, these sensitive lichens disappear. In moderately polluted areas, you might only find the hard, crusty types. And in very polluted urban centers? You might not find any lichens at all. So by simply observing the lichen population, we can create a map of air pollution levels.
Okay, so that's air. What about water? For aquatic environments, we often look to amphibians, particularly frogs. Why frogs? Two main reasons. First, they have highly permeable skin. That means substances from the water can pass right through it into their bodies. This makes them very susceptible to waterborne pollutants like pesticides and heavy metals. Second, they have a two-part life cycle. They live in the water as tadpoles and on land as adults, so their health reflects the conditions of both the aquatic and terrestrial environments.
When scientists find frog populations with high rates of deformities—like extra limbs—or see a sudden population decline, it's a huge red flag. It strongly suggests the presence of chemical contaminants in the water.
But—and this is a critical point—it's not always so straightforward, of course. A decline in a frog population isn't a simple equation where 'fewer frogs' equals 'pollution'. It could be caused by disease, habitat loss, or a new predator. That's why scientists have to study the correlation, not just assume causation. They look at multiple factors. But a widespread problem with a known bio-indicator species is a very strong signal that we need to investigate the environment more closely.
So, to wrap up, bio-indicators are like living barometers for environmental health. From lichens telling us about the air we breathe to frogs signaling problems in our water, these organisms provide invaluable, low-cost data. Next time, we’ll discuss how this data is collected systematically and used to influence environmental policy.
- Topic: Bio-indicators (B-I)
- Def: living organism (plant, animal) -> shows health of env.
- "early warning system"
- Ex: Canary in coal mine (hist.) -> sensitive to toxic gas
- What makes a good B-I?
- Sensitive to pollutants (but not too much)
- Widespread/common
- Sedentary (don't move) -> shows health of specific spot
- Examples:
- Lichens (Air Quality)
- Absorb nutrients from air -> absorb pollutants (SO2)
- Clean air = leafy, bushy lichens
- Mod. pollution = crusty lichens only
- V. polluted = no lichens
- Frogs (Water Quality)
- Why? 1) Permeable skin (absorb water pollutants) 2) 2-part life (water & land)
- Sign of trouble: deformities, pop. decline -> red flag for chemicals
- Lichens (Air Quality)
- CRITICAL POINT: Correlation ≠ Causation
- Frog decline could be disease, predator, etc. NOT just pollution
- Need to investigate, not assume
- Conclusion: B-I = living barometers, low-cost data
1. What is the main purpose of the lecture?
2. According to the professor, what is a primary reason that sedentary organisms make good bio-indicators?
3. Why does the professor mention the "canary in a coal mine"?
4. What can be inferred about an area where only crusty lichens are found on trees?
5. Based on the lecture, indicate whether each statement accurately describes a characteristic of the bio-indicator. For each statement, click in the correct box.
Statement | Describes Lichens | Describes Amphibians |
---|---|---|
Indicates water quality | ||
Has permeable skin | ||
Absorbs nutrients primarily from the air |
6. Listen again to this part of the lecture. Then answer the question.
Your Results
Glossary & Key Terms
Term | English Definition & Burmese Translation |
---|---|
Bio-indicator | An organism whose status in an ecosystem is analyzed as an indication of the ecosystem's health. ဇီဝညွှန်းကိန်း (Zîwa nyùn-gain) EN: Lichens are a well-known bio-indicator for air quality. MM: လိုင်ကင်များသည် လေထုအရည်အသွေးအတွက် လူသိများသော ဇီဝညွှန်းကိန်းတစ်ခု ဖြစ်သည်။ |
Ecology | The study of how organisms interact with their environment. ဂေဟဗေဒ (Gay-ha-bay-da) EN: Ecology is the study of how organisms interact with their environment. MM: ဂေဟဗေဒသည် သက်ရှိများ ၎င်းတို့၏ ပတ်ဝန်းကျင်နှင့် မည်သို့ အပြန်အလှန်သက်ရောက်သည်ကို လေ့လာခြင်းဖြစ်သည်။ |
Pollutant | A substance that pollutes something, especially water or the atmosphere. ညစ်ညမ်းစေသောဒြပ် (Nyit-nyan-say-daw-drat) EN: Sulfur dioxide is a major pollutant from burning fossil fuels. MM: ဆာလဖာဒိုင်အောက်ဆိုဒ်သည် ကျောက်ဖြစ်ရုပ်ကြွင်းလောင်စာများ လောင်ကျွမ်းခြင်းမှ ထွက်သော အဓိက ညစ်ညမ်းစေသောဒြပ် ဖြစ်သည်။ |
Sensitive (to) | Quick to detect or respond to slight changes, signals, or influences. ထိလွယ်ရှလွယ်သော (Hti-lwè-sha-lwè-daw) EN: Canaries are very sensitive to toxic gases in the air. MM: ကနေရီငှက်များသည် လေထဲရှိ အဆိပ်ငွေ့များကို အလွန်ထိလွယ်ရှလွယ်ကြသည်။ |
Sedentary | Inhabiting the same locality throughout life; not migratory or nomadic. တစ်နေရာတည်းတွင် အခြေချနေထိုင်သော (Ta-nay-yar-dè-hmwar a-chay-cha-nay-htain-daw) EN: Mussels are sedentary organisms, making them good for local water testing. MM: ကမာကောင်များသည် တစ်နေရာတည်းတွင် အခြေချနေထိုင်သော သက်ရှိများဖြစ်သောကြောင့် ဒေသတွင်း ရေစစ်ဆေးရန် ကောင်းမွန်သည်။ |
Permeable | Allowing liquids or gases to pass through it. စိမ့်ဝင်နိုင်သော (Seint-win-naing-daw) EN: The permeable skin of a frog allows chemicals to pass through it easily. MM: ဖား၏ စိမ့်ဝင်နိုင်သော အရေပြားသည် ဓာတုပစ္စည်းများကို အလွယ်တကူ ဖြတ်သန်းသွားစေသည်။ |
Correlation | A mutual relationship or connection between two or more things. အပြန်အလှန်ဆက်စပ်မှု (A-pyan-a-hlan-set-sut-hmu) EN: Scientists found a strong correlation between the pesticide level and the number of frog deformities. MM: သိပ္ပံပညာရှင်များသည် ပိုးသတ်ဆေးပမာဏနှင့် ဖားပုံပျက်ခြင်းအရေအတွက်ကြားတွင် ခိုင်မာသော အပြန်အလှန်ဆက်စပ်မှုကို တွေ့ရှိခဲ့သည်။ |
Widespread | Found or distributed over a large area or number of people. ပျံ့နှံ့နေသော (Pyant-hnant-nay-daw) EN: The use of this technology is becoming more widespread across the country. MM: ဤနည်းပညာကို အသုံးပြုခြင်းသည် တစ်နိုင်ငံလုံးတွင် ပိုမိုပျံ့နှံ့လာနေသည်။ |
Additional Exercise: Cloze Test
Use the words from the glossary to complete the paragraph.
Word Bank: Ecology, Bio-indicator, Pollutants, Sensitive, Sedentary, Permeable, Correlation, Widespread
In the field of 1. _______, scientists often rely on a special type of organism known as a 2. _______ to gauge environmental health. A good one must be 3. _______ to chemical changes. For example, lichens are useful because they are 4. _______, meaning they stay in one place and reflect local air quality. They absorb atmospheric 5. _______ directly. Similarly, frogs are useful for water testing because their skin is highly 6. _______, allowing contaminants to enter their bodies. Although the decline of a 7. _______ species like frogs is a concern, researchers must establish a clear 8. _______ with pollution levels rather than jumping to conclusions.